What is Stereoacuity test kit: Uses, Safety, Operation, and top Manufacturers!

Introduction

A Stereoacuity test kit is a clinical device used to assess stereopsis—the visual system’s ability to perceive depth from binocular (two-eye) vision. In practical terms, it helps teams understand how well a patient can detect small differences in depth when each eye receives a slightly different image.

Stereopsis is only one part of “depth perception.” People also use monocular depth cues (such as relative size, perspective, motion parallax, shading, and overlap) to judge distance. A stereoacuity test kit is valuable because it aims to isolate the binocular disparity component—how precisely the brain can use the small positional differences between the right-eye and left-eye images to infer depth. This makes stereoacuity results particularly sensitive to real-world factors that affect binocular vision performance, such as ocular alignment, suppression, refractive correction status, and the patient’s ability to maintain stable fixation during the test.

In hospitals and clinics, this medical equipment is commonly used in ophthalmology, optometry, pediatrics, neurology-adjacent assessments, occupational health, and pre-/post-intervention documentation workflows. It is typically low-risk, quick to administer, and highly dependent on correct setup, patient cooperation, and standardized technique.

Operationally, stereoacuity testing sits in an interesting space: it can function as a screening tool (quick “gross” stereo checks) or as a documentation tool (tracking a graded threshold over time). The same kit may be used by different teams for different goals, so standardization—distance, lighting, instruction script, and scoring rules—matters more than many users initially expect.

This article explains what a Stereoacuity test kit is, when it is appropriate to use, how to operate it consistently, how to manage safety and infection control, and how procurement and market conditions differ globally. The guidance is informational and operational (not medical advice) and should always be used alongside your facility protocols and the manufacturer’s instructions for use.

What is Stereoacuity test kit and why do we use it?

A Stereoacuity test kit is a set of tools designed to measure stereoacuity, usually expressed as the smallest binocular disparity a person can detect. Stereoacuity is often reported in seconds of arc (arcseconds), but some kits use pass/fail levels, graded steps, or category bands depending on design.

A helpful operational note: arcseconds are an angular unit. In many kits, as the levels become “harder,” the disparity steps reduce in a way that is not always linear. That means a change from one level to the next may represent a small or large functional difference depending on the test design. This is one reason facilities should be cautious about comparing outcomes across different test families or assuming that “one level better” always means the same magnitude of improvement.

Clear definition and purpose

Most Stereoacuity test kit formats rely on presenting two slightly different images, one intended for each eye. The kit then verifies whether the patient can fuse these images into a single 3D perception and discriminate depth differences at progressively smaller levels.

In operational terms, stereo tests commonly fall into a few broad design families (naming varies by manufacturer):

Contour-based (local) stereopsis tests: use identifiable outlines (circles, animals, symbols). These are often easy to explain but may be more vulnerable to monocular cues if print artifacts or edge cues are present.
Random-dot (global) stereopsis tests: use dot patterns where the “hidden” target is only detectable through binocular fusion, reducing the chance that the patient can solve the task using outlines alone.
Real-depth tests (in some kits): use physical depth separation rather than purely printed disparity. These can be helpful in certain workflows, but they may have different handling, cleaning, and durability considerations.

Common kit components (varies by manufacturer) include:

Printed test plates or a test booklet (often with shapes, animals, circles, or random-dot patterns)
Viewing filters (e.g., polarized glasses, red/green glasses, or lenticular viewing technology)
Instructions for use and scoring sheets
A carry case to protect optical media and reduce damage during transport
Sometimes, near/distance accessories (e.g., fixed viewing frames, measuring cord, occluder)

Many kits also include (or benefit from) additional practical items even if they are not packaged in the box, such as:

A distance marker or pre-measured cord that enforces consistent test distance
A response card or pointing aid for non-verbal children (or for language barriers)
A spare filter set so a scratched lens does not halt a clinic list
A soft, lint-free optical cloth (if permitted) to remove smudges without scratching filters
A protective sleeve for booklets when moving between rooms to reduce corner wear and page delamination

Some facilities also use digital or screen-based stereo tests. These may be packaged as software plus viewing glasses and a compatible display. Whether a digital system is considered part of a “kit” depends on procurement definitions and local regulatory classification. Digital stereo testing can add new variables (screen brightness, pixel density, crosstalk, configuration drift), so many organizations treat it more like a small diagnostic system than a simple booklet.

Common clinical settings

A Stereoacuity test kit is typically used in:

Ophthalmology and optometry clinics for binocular vision assessment and documentation
Pediatric services where cooperation and quick test administration are priorities
Pre-employment and occupational health settings where depth perception may be relevant to role requirements (policies vary)
Vision screening programs in schools or community health initiatives (especially where portable tools are needed)
Rehabilitation and multidisciplinary services when binocular vision status affects task performance (interpretation varies by clinical pathway)

In many facilities, stereoacuity testing is also part of orthoptic-style workflows (by orthoptists or trained technicians) where binocular status is documented alongside other measurements. Some programs use stereo testing as an early indicator of whether more detailed binocular vision evaluation may be needed, while others use it primarily as an outcomes measure after an intervention plan.

From a hospital operations perspective, these kits are also used in:

Standardized documentation (baseline vs. follow-up comparisons)
Clinic throughput optimization (rapid, repeatable tests)
Multi-site standardization (same kit type across satellite clinics to reduce variability)

In addition, stereoacuity results sometimes become part of administrative documents (for example, occupational clearance files). Because these outcomes can have non-clinical consequences, many organizations add extra emphasis on traceable documentation: test type, distance, correction status, and cooperation notes.

Key benefits in patient care and workflow

When implemented with consistent technique, a Stereoacuity test kit can provide:

Quick, non-invasive assessment of binocular depth perception
Portable workflow for outreach clinics, bedside assessments (where appropriate), and multi-room practices
Structured, repeatable recording when the same test and distance are used over time
Minimal infrastructure needs compared with larger ophthalmic diagnostic platforms
Low training barrier for basic administration (while still requiring competency controls)

Beyond the immediate test result, stereoacuity kits can support operational goals such as:

Efficient triage support when a pathway requires documentation of binocular function before referral, therapy, or additional diagnostics
Communication with patients and families using a concrete, understandable output (e.g., “passed up to level X”)—while still documenting limitations and cooperation clearly
Quality improvement initiatives, where standardized outcomes can be tracked across clinicians or sites (as long as the same kit, distance, and method are used)
Reduced equipment dependency in settings where advanced imaging systems are limited or where power supply, room size, or IT integration are constraints

It is important operationally to treat the kit as a standardized measurement tool: results are highly sensitive to viewing distance, lighting, patient understanding, and the condition of the test media.

When should I use Stereoacuity test kit (and when should I not)?

Use decisions should follow local policy, scope-of-practice rules, and clinical pathways. The points below are general operational guidance, not medical advice.

Appropriate use cases

A Stereoacuity test kit is commonly appropriate when the goal is to:

Screen or document binocular vision function as part of a broader eye assessment
Establish a baseline before an intervention or therapy plan (as defined by clinicians)
Compare follow-up results using the same method, distance, and scoring system
Support triage workflows where binocular vision status may influence prioritization (facility-dependent)
Provide standardized documentation for occupational or administrative requirements (policy-driven)

It can be particularly useful when a facility needs a portable and cost-contained way to add depth-perception assessment without complex instrumentation.

Operational examples that often appear in real clinics include:

Adding a stereoacuity measure to routine pediatric vision checks where binocular function is a required documentation field
Including stereo testing in pre- and post-care documentation so the team can see whether binocular performance appears stable under the same test conditions
Running quick stereo screening in community programs where the objective is to identify individuals who may need a comprehensive eye exam (based on the local program design)

Situations where it may not be suitable

A Stereoacuity test kit may be less suitable or produce unreliable outputs when:

The patient cannot understand or reliably perform the task due to age, cognitive status, fatigue, language barriers, or distress
The environment cannot be controlled (incorrect distance, poor lighting, frequent interruptions)
The test media are worn, faded, scratched, or contaminated—making results non-comparable
The patient is missing required viewing aids (e.g., glasses) and local protocols require testing with habitual correction
There is a high likelihood of guessing or the patient can use monocular cues (depends on test design)

Some tests are more resistant to monocular cues than others, but this varies by manufacturer and test type.

Additional operational limitations that facilities sometimes overlook:

Color vision deficiency considerations: anaglyph (red/green) designs rely on color separation. If a patient has difficulty with red/green discrimination or if lighting changes color balance significantly, results may be less reliable (kit-dependent).
Strong tinted lenses or photochromic lenses: tinted lenses can alter perceived contrast or color separation (especially with anaglyph designs). Local protocols may specify whether to test with habitual correction exactly as worn or to remove certain overlays.
Poor near performance due to non-visual factors: for near tests, patients with difficulty maintaining a steady working distance (tremor, limited head control, severe fatigue) may generate inconsistent results even if binocular function is otherwise adequate.
Time constraints that force rushing: stereoacuity can look “worse” when the patient is hurried or when the operator changes instructions mid-test, so a rushed environment can reduce the validity of documentation.

Safety cautions and contraindications (general, non-clinical)

Stereo testing is usually low risk, but facilities should still manage predictable safety issues:

Infection control risks from shared glasses/frames and high-touch items
Discomfort (headache, eye strain, nausea, dizziness) in some individuals during binocular tasks
Trip/fall risk if testing involves temporary occlusion or moving through the clinic with one eye covered
Photosensitivity or visual discomfort in bright rooms or with reflective/glare-heavy setups

General contraindications are not universal and vary by manufacturer and clinical context. If a patient reports significant discomfort or becomes distressed, teams should stop and follow facility protocols.

In addition, consider administrative and human-factor “safety” issues: stereoacuity outcomes can affect occupational eligibility in some contexts. Facilities should ensure that staff do not overstate certainty when a result is clearly limited by cooperation or environment, and that “inconclusive” is used appropriately rather than forcing a threshold.

What do I need before starting?

A Stereoacuity test kit is simple to deploy, but consistent results depend on preparation, standardization, and documentation.

Required setup, environment, and accessories

Common setup requirements include:

A stable seating position for the patient and operator
Controlled lighting without glare on plates or filters
Space to maintain the correct viewing distance (near and/or distance testing)
A method to measure distance (tape measure, fixed cord, marked floor line)
The correct viewing filters for the kit (polarized or red/green, as supplied)
Documentation tools (paper form, EMR template, or standardized clinic sheet)

Accessories that often improve reliability:

Occluder (for pre-checks, if part of local protocol)
Spare glasses/filters (to reduce downtime if damaged)
A dedicated storage sleeve/case to prevent plate bending and surface abrasion

If your organization uses multiple sites, standardize the same kit model and testing distance across locations when possible to reduce inter-site variability.

Practical environmental controls that often matter in day-to-day clinics:

Background control: a plain background behind the plate/booklet (instead of a patterned wall or window) can make it easier for the patient to fixate and reduces distractions.
Operator positioning: the operator should be able to see both the patient’s face and the test surface to spot peeking, head tilts, or removal of filters.
Glare sources: windows, glossy desk surfaces, and overhead spotlights can create reflections that either hide targets or create monocular cues. Minor room adjustments (turning the patient slightly, changing the plate angle while keeping it perpendicular to gaze, or lowering a blind) can materially change test reliability.

Training/competency expectations

Even though the device is low complexity, it is still medical equipment used for clinical documentation. Typical competency elements include:

Understanding kit-specific instructions and scoring rules
Knowing how to set and verify viewing distance
Communicating standardized patient instructions (and avoiding coaching that biases responses)
Recognizing unreliable behavior (guessing, peeking, turning the head, removing glasses)
Recording results correctly, including test type, distance, and any deviations

Facilities often assign administration to orthoptists, ophthalmic technicians, optometrists, or trained nursing/allied health staff depending on local practice.

For multi-operator services (high-volume pediatric clinics, screening programs, multi-site networks), additional competency controls often improve consistency:

A short standard script for the instruction and demonstration phase
A periodic inter-operator check (two operators observe the same test) to reduce drift in coaching style and stop rules
Clear rules for when to record “inconclusive” versus a numerical value
Refresher training when a new kit version, booklet revision, or different filter type is introduced

Pre-use checks and documentation

Before each session (or each clinic day, per policy), check:

Test plates/booklet condition: no peeling, fading, warping, or stains
Filters/glasses: clean, not scratched, correct type for the kit
Completeness: all levels/plates present, instructions available
Environment: adequate lighting, no reflections, correct seating
Identification and documentation: correct patient record, standardized template ready

For quality systems, consider maintaining a simple log:

Kit ID/serial or asset label (if assigned)
Date put into service
Cleaning method used (if required by policy)
Replacement history for glasses/filters and booklets

Shelf-life and replacement cycles vary by manufacturer and are not publicly stated in many cases.

Additional quick checks that can prevent wasted clinic time:

Orientation/assembly check: ensure the correct glasses are paired with the correct booklet and that filters are not swapped between different kits that look similar.
Functional “sanity check” (where policy allows): a trained staff member with known good stereopsis briefly confirms that the demonstration item shows depth as expected. This is not a clinical test of the staff member; it is a functional verification that the kit has not been damaged or mixed with the wrong filters.
Documentation readiness: confirm the EMR template has fields for distance and test type. If those fields are missing, results often become non-comparable later.

How do I use it correctly (basic operation)?

Operating a Stereoacuity test kit is fundamentally about standardized presentation and consistent scoring. The workflow below is intentionally generic; always follow the kit’s instructions for use.

Basic step-by-step workflow

Prepare the environment: stable seating, controlled lighting, and measured distance.
Confirm the kit type: polarized, red/green (anaglyph), lenticular, or digital display-based.
Explain the task in plain language: what the patient will see and how to respond (pointing, naming, matching).
Fit the viewing filters: ensure correct orientation and comfort; confirm the patient keeps them on.
Start with demonstration items (if provided): confirm the patient understands the response format.
Present test levels in the correct order: typically from easier (larger disparity) to harder (smaller disparity).
Maintain consistent timing: do not rush; avoid excessive coaching; allow enough time per plate as per local practice.
Record the result: smallest level correctly identified according to kit rules (often requiring correct responses on a defined number of items).
Note test conditions: distance, lighting deviations, patient cooperation, use of habitual correction, and any interruptions.
End the test promptly if needed: follow protocols if the patient reports discomfort or becomes unable to continue.

Operational enhancements that can improve consistency without adding much time:

Use the same instruction phrasing for each patient (age-appropriate). For example, instructing “which one is popping out?” is different from “which one is different?” and can change how the patient approaches the task.
For children or non-verbal patients, consider a consistent response method such as pointing, matching to a card, or touching the corresponding position. This reduces language effects.
Where local policy permits, include a brief control step (such as asking the patient to identify a demonstration target with one eye covered) to help detect obvious monocular cue use. This must be done carefully and in alignment with the kit instructions, because some tests may still contain cues even when used improperly.

Setup details that affect reliability

Key operational controls:

Viewing distance: Many near stereo tests are designed for a fixed near distance (often around reading distance). Distance stereo tests require a longer room length. Use the kit’s stated distance; do not estimate by eye.
Line of sight: Keep plates perpendicular to the patient’s gaze to reduce reflections and unintended cues.
Lighting: Avoid strong overhead glare on glossy plates. Consistent ambient lighting improves repeatability.
Patient posture: Encourage straight head position; tilting can sometimes change how filters behave and introduce artifacts.
Correct spectacles/contact lenses: Whether testing should be performed with habitual correction or best correction depends on local clinical protocol.

Additional practical details that frequently affect real-world testing:

Avoid plate bending: even small bends in a booklet can change how a glossy surface reflects light and can create visible printing artifacts. Hold the booklet by edges when possible.
Glasses fit and fogging: poorly fitting filters may slide, tilt, or fog—especially in humid environments or when a patient is masked. Briefly ensuring a stable fit can prevent false failures.
Patient “search behavior”: some patients scan rapidly and guess. It may help to slow the pace and ask them to commit to a single answer, but avoid leading them toward the correct response.
Consistent working distance for near tests: if a patient leans forward/back repeatedly, disparity changes. A simple elbow-on-table posture or a fixed support can stabilize distance.

Calibration (if relevant) and routine verification

Most paper-based Stereoacuity test kit formats do not have “calibration” in the engineering sense, but they still require routine verification:

Inspect for fading or color shift (especially for anaglyph tests that rely on color separation)
Check polarization function (for polarized systems) by confirming the filters are not damaged and produce the intended separation
Verify plate order and scoring keys are intact and legible
Replace damaged glasses/filters promptly; scratches can reduce test validity

For digital or screen-based stereo tests, calibration considerations may include:

Display brightness and contrast settings (per manufacturer guidance)
Correct viewing mode and compatible screen technology
Software version control and configuration lock-down

These factors vary by manufacturer and are not publicly stated in many cases.

From an operational quality perspective, some departments define a simple verification cadence such as:

Daily visual inspection in high-throughput areas (pediatric clinics)
Weekly functional verification using a demonstration item under the same room lighting
Post-transport inspection when kits are moved between sites, outreach events, or mobile clinics
Post-cleaning checks if a new disinfectant product is introduced (to confirm it does not cloud filters or damage print)

Typical settings and what they generally mean

A Stereoacuity test kit may offer:

Near stereo testing: performed at a fixed near distance; useful for clinic rooms and quick workflows.
Distance stereo testing: requires longer space and may reflect different real-world depth tasks; depends on facility layout.
Random-dot vs. contour-based targets: random-dot designs can reduce monocular cues; contour-based designs may be easier for some patients to understand. The trade-offs vary by test.

Most kits score as:

A specific threshold value (often arcseconds), where lower generally indicates finer stereo discrimination
A highest level passed (e.g., “passed level X”)
A qualitative result (e.g., “unable to complete,” “inconclusive,” “not testable”), which should be documented transparently rather than forced into a numeric score

A useful documentation practice is to record both the best level passed and, when relevant, the pattern of responses (e.g., consistent on easy levels but random on mid-levels). In some clinics, that response pattern helps the interpreting clinician distinguish between “true reduced stereopsis” versus “limited attention” or “task confusion.”

How do I keep the patient safe?

Stereo testing is typically non-invasive, but safety is not automatic. Patient safety depends on infection control, human factors, and appropriate supervision.

Safety practices and monitoring

Operational safety basics:

Confirm patient identity and explain the procedure at a level they can understand.
Check for immediate discomfort (headache, nausea, dizziness, eye strain). If symptoms arise, stop and follow local protocols.
Avoid fall hazards: if occlusion is used during any part of the workflow, ensure the patient remains seated and supported.
Maintain privacy and dignity: especially in pediatric or occupational settings where results can be sensitive.

For pediatric workflows:

Use child-friendly instructions and short test blocks.
Watch for cues of guessing (rapid random answers) or fatigue.
Allow breaks rather than pushing through a long sequence.

Additional safety and comfort considerations that often improve cooperation:

Adjust for sensory sensitivities: some children (and some adults) dislike wearing unfamiliar glasses or having anything on the face. Briefly showing the glasses and allowing a moment of adjustment can reduce distress.
Respect motion sickness susceptibility: tasks involving binocular fusion can trigger nausea in a small subset of patients. Keeping the test brief and stopping early when symptoms start is usually safer than “trying to push through.”
Be cautious with disinfectant residue: if cleaning is done immediately before use, ensure the glasses are fully dry. Residual disinfectant can irritate skin or eyes.

Alarm handling and human factors

A Stereoacuity test kit typically does not have electronic alarms. Instead, the “alarm conditions” are human-factor triggers:

The patient repeatedly removes or tilts the glasses
The patient cannot describe the task even after demonstration
The operator notices strong reflections, incorrect distance, or plate damage
The patient becomes distressed or symptomatic

Facilities should treat these triggers as reasons to pause and either reset conditions or terminate the test.

Human factors that commonly drive errors (and how to mitigate them):

Over-coaching: repeating “look harder” or “try the middle one” can unintentionally guide responses. Use neutral prompts and consistent phrasing.
Time pressure: in high-throughput clinics, staff may rush. A brief checklist (distance, lighting, glasses, understanding) can prevent poor-quality results that later require retesting.
Communication barriers: if an interpreter is needed, ensure the interpreter understands the task is about identifying depth/raised targets, not “reading” the page. For hearing-impaired patients, demonstrate response methods visually.

Emphasize following facility protocols and manufacturer guidance

Because kits differ significantly, safety and performance depend on:

Using the correct glasses/filters for the specific test
Following the manufacturer’s cleaning compatibility guidance (especially for coated lenses or printed plates)
Applying local policies on PPE, cleaning frequency, and single-patient vs shared accessories
Ensuring staff stay within their scope of practice and documentation rules

If your organization standardizes a Stereoacuity test kit across multiple departments, create a brief internal SOP that aligns the manufacturer’s instructions with facility infection-control and documentation requirements.

How do I interpret the output?

Interpretation should be performed by qualified professionals and in context with the broader clinical picture. This section explains how outputs are typically structured and what can make them misleading.

Types of outputs/readings

Common output formats include:

Stereo threshold (arcseconds): The smallest disparity level the patient can correctly identify under standardized conditions.
Pass/fail by level: The patient passes certain plates or steps and fails others.
Qualitative notes: “not testable,” “inconclusive,” “poor cooperation,” or “inconsistent responses.”

Some kits provide multiple subtests (e.g., a gross stereo demonstration plus a finer threshold series). Record each component separately if your documentation system allows.

In addition, some documentation styles include a “ceiling/floor” concept:

If the kit’s finest level is passed, some teams record this as “≤ finest level” because the true threshold could be even better than the kit can measure.
If the patient cannot pass the easiest level, some teams document “no measurable stereo on this test” rather than implying a numeric threshold that was never demonstrated.

How clinicians typically interpret them (general)

In general operational terms:

Lower stereo threshold values typically indicate finer stereo discrimination.
Higher values (or inability to pass early levels) may indicate reduced stereopsis or unreliable testing conditions.
Many teams use stereoacuity results to complement other assessments rather than as a standalone determinant.

For administrators and operations leaders, the key is consistency:

Ensure the same test type, same distance, and same scoring rules are used for follow-up comparisons.
Avoid comparing results across different kits as if they are interchangeable; cross-test equivalence varies by manufacturer and is not always validated publicly.

A practical operational point: many stereo kits use stepwise levels (for example, 800 → 400 → 200 → 100 → 60 → 40 arcseconds, depending on the test). If a patient’s result changes by one step, that can be meaningful, but it can also reflect day-to-day variability, attention, or minor setup differences. Where decisions rely on the result, teams often benefit from documenting the test conditions carefully and, when appropriate, repeating a small subset for confirmation.

Common pitfalls and limitations

Stereoacuity testing is vulnerable to operational error. Common pitfalls include:

Incorrect viewing distance: even small deviations can change effective disparity and invalidate comparisons.
Glare and reflections: glossy plates can reveal cues or obscure targets.
Wrong glasses: mixing polarized and anaglyph filters (or using damaged filters) can produce false failures.
Monocular cues: some tests can be “solved” without true stereopsis if the patient picks up on outlines, shadows, printing artifacts, or learned patterns.
Guessing and coaching: repeated prompting can bias results; standardized phrasing helps.
Language and comprehension: the task may be misunderstood even if vision is adequate.
Media wear: faded colors and worn prints change the test’s optical properties over time.

Other limitations that can affect longitudinal comparability:

Learning effects: patients who have seen a specific booklet repeatedly may remember where targets are. Some programs mitigate this by using alternate forms or by spacing out repeated testing where feasible.
Ceiling/floor effects: if a kit does not measure very fine stereo, many patients will cluster at the “best” score, reducing sensitivity to change. Conversely, if many patients fail the easiest levels, a finer-grained kit may be needed (depending on pathway goals).
Inter-operator variability: small differences in encouragement, pace, and demonstration can change performance. This is why competency checks and a standard script matter for program-level metrics.

A practical documentation safeguard is to record not just the numeric result, but also:

Test name/model (as written on the kit)
Test distance
Lighting or room constraints (if any)
Patient cooperation and any deviations from standard procedure

What if something goes wrong?

Issues with a Stereoacuity test kit are usually related to setup, consumables (glasses/filters), environmental conditions, or user technique. A structured troubleshooting approach prevents repeated unreliable testing.

A troubleshooting checklist

Use this checklist when results seem inconsistent or the patient cannot perform the test:

Confirm the correct test distance using a measured method.
Check room lighting and remove glare sources.
Verify the correct glasses/filters are being used and oriented properly.
Clean the glasses/filters; confirm there are no heavy scratches or delamination.
Inspect plates for wear, fading, bending, stains, or peeling.
Re-explain the task using a demonstration item (if available).
Ensure the patient is using any required correction per local protocol.
Repeat a small subset to confirm reliability rather than restarting the entire test immediately.
Consider whether the patient is fatigued; offer a break if appropriate.
Document “inconclusive” rather than forcing a numeric value when conditions are not met.

Additional troubleshooting steps that are often useful in practice:

Check for swapped accessories: in busy clinics, glasses from different kits can get mixed. Even if they look similar, they may not match the plate technology.
Assess for filter orientation issues: some polarized systems are sensitive to rotation. If the patient tilts their head significantly, results can change; re-seat the glasses and re-cue head position.
Consider color/contrast effects (especially for anaglyph tests): verify that room lighting is not heavily colored (some LED lighting can skew color balance) and that the patient’s lenses are not heavily tinted.
Reduce distractions: for children, remove nearby toys/screens during the test. For adults, reduce background conversation and interruptions.
Use an alternate response mode: if naming shapes is difficult, switch to pointing or matching while keeping scoring rules consistent.

When to stop use

Stop the test and follow facility escalation pathways if:

The patient reports significant discomfort (headache, nausea, dizziness) or becomes distressed
The patient cannot understand the task even after standardized instruction
The kit appears damaged in a way that could invalidate results (missing plates, severe fading, damaged filters)
You suspect cross-contamination risk due to visible soil that cannot be removed safely

In some settings, it is also appropriate to stop when repeated attempts are clearly generating random guessing. Continuing can produce misleading documentation and can frustrate the patient, reducing cooperation for other parts of the exam.

When to escalate to biomedical engineering or the manufacturer

Escalate to biomedical engineering, clinical engineering, or the manufacturer/distributor when:

The kit has repeated reliability complaints across operators
Accessories (filters, frames, viewing devices) are failing prematurely
A digital system shows display incompatibility, software errors, or configuration drift
Replacement parts availability is unclear or the kit lacks clear part identifiers (varies by manufacturer)

For procurement teams, recurring issues should trigger a review of:

Consumables availability (replacement glasses/filters)
After-sales support responsiveness
Standardization opportunities across departments to reduce part fragmentation

Infection control and cleaning of Stereoacuity test kit

Infection control for a Stereoacuity test kit focuses on high-touch items shared between patients. Most kits contact intact skin only, but they still require routine cleaning and disinfection consistent with facility policy.

Cleaning principles

Core principles include:

Clean when visibly soiled and at the frequency defined by your infection-control risk assessment.
Use only cleaning chemistries compatible with the kit materials (varies by manufacturer).
Avoid saturating printed plates or booklets unless the manufacturer explicitly permits it.
Ensure proper contact time for disinfectants as defined by your facility-approved products.

Because many kits use printed media and coated filters, aggressive chemicals can cause fading, delamination, or optical distortion over time.

A practical operations detail: even when disinfectants are technically compatible, frequent wiping of optical filters can create micro-scratches over months of use. Facilities often balance infection control needs with optical quality by (1) using approved lens-safe products, (2) wiping gently with a single direction rather than scrubbing, and (3) replacing filters on a defined schedule when throughput is high.

Disinfection vs. sterilization (general)

Cleaning removes visible soil and reduces bioburden.
Disinfection uses chemical agents to inactivate many pathogens on surfaces.
Sterilization is intended to eliminate all microbial life and is generally not applicable to standard stereo test booklets and glasses.

Most Stereoacuity test kit components are treated as non-critical items (contacting intact skin). Your facility’s infection prevention team should define the required disinfection level based on use setting, patient population, and local regulations.

In higher-risk settings (immunocompromised patients, outbreak periods, high-touch pediatric clinics), some facilities adopt additional controls such as assigning single-patient glasses or using a barrier approach (where compatible with the device) to reduce shared-contact surfaces.

High-touch points

Common high-touch components include:

Glasses frames and nose bridge
Lens surfaces (filters)
Occluders (if used)
Booklet cover edges and page corners
Handles, case latches, and storage containers
Any measuring cord or fixed distance device used repeatedly

Also consider “hidden” touch points that are frequently handled but overlooked, such as:

The inside of a carry case where glasses are placed after use
Elastic straps or foam padding on certain viewing frames
Clip-on filter holders that may contact the patient’s own spectacles

Example cleaning workflow (non-brand-specific)

A practical, non-brand-specific workflow many facilities adapt:

Perform hand hygiene and don gloves if required by local policy.
Inspect items for visible soil and damage before cleaning.
Wipe glasses/filters with a facility-approved disinfectant wipe compatible with optical surfaces (compatibility varies by manufacturer).
Wipe the booklet cover and any plastic surfaces; avoid soaking paper pages.
Allow disinfectant to remain wet for the required contact time (per the disinfectant IFU).
Air dry fully before returning the kit to its case to prevent moisture damage and microbial growth.
Replace heavily scratched or clouded filters that cannot be restored by cleaning.
Document cleaning completion if your department requires traceability (common in high-throughput clinics).

If your kit includes electronics (screen-based systems), use electronics-safe cleaning methods and follow manufacturer guidance strictly.

Many departments also implement simple workflow controls:

A clean/dirty separation on the work surface (e.g., left side for “ready to use,” right side for “needs cleaning”)
A rule that the kit is never returned to the storage cabinet until it is fully dry
A periodic deep-clean of the carry case interior (as permitted) because cases can accumulate dust and residue that transfer back to glasses

Medical Device Companies & OEMs

Stereoacuity tools are often sourced through specialized vision-testing manufacturers, but many healthcare systems procure them through broader medical device supply channels. Understanding who actually makes the product matters for quality assurance and lifecycle support.

Manufacturer vs. OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer)

A manufacturer is the entity that designs and produces the medical device and is typically responsible for regulatory compliance, labeling, and post-market surveillance (jurisdiction-dependent).
An OEM produces components or complete products that may be sold under another company’s brand (private label) or integrated into a larger system.

In practice, a Stereoacuity test kit may be:

Manufactured and branded by the same company
Manufactured by an OEM and branded/distributed by another company
Assembled from multiple suppliers (e.g., booklet, glasses, case) under one label

For hospitals, the difference matters because the “brand on the box” may not be the organization that can answer detailed questions about optical materials, print tolerances, or the expected lifespan of filters under repeated disinfection.

How OEM relationships impact quality, support, and service

OEM relationships can affect:

Consistency of print quality, filters, and scoring across production batches
Availability of spare parts (replacement glasses, filters, booklets)
Warranty handling (who actually services or replaces the product)
Documentation quality (clarity of IFU, cleaning compatibility, and training materials)

For procurement and biomedical engineering teams, it is reasonable to request:

Product identifiers (model, revision, lot/batch where applicable)
Cleaning and disinfection compatibility statements
Spare parts list and expected replacement intervals (often varies by manufacturer and is not publicly stated)

Additional due-diligence questions that often prevent future problems:

Are there revision changes in the booklet that affect scoring steps (even if the product name stayed the same)?
Are replacement glasses/filters backward compatible with older booklets in your inventory?
Is there a stated storage range (temperature/humidity) that matters for outreach programs?
Are there any restrictions on lamination, protective covers, or labeling (some facilities label devices with asset tags, which can accidentally cover important optical areas if placed incorrectly)?

Top 5 World Best Medical Device Companies / Manufacturers

The list below is example industry leaders (not a ranking). Portfolios vary, and not all companies listed manufacture stereo test kits directly; many operate in broader ophthalmology and medical equipment categories.

Carl Zeiss Meditec
Widely recognized for ophthalmic diagnostic and surgical platforms across many care settings. The company’s footprint is global, with strong presence in advanced eye-care markets and tertiary centers. For stereo testing specifically, facilities may encounter Zeiss-adjacent workflows through broader vision diagnostics rather than standalone stereo booklets. Product availability and local support depend on region and distributor networks. In many hospital environments, procurement teams may already have Zeiss service relationships for other devices, which can influence vendor preference even when the stereo test itself is a small-ticket item.
Johnson & Johnson Vision
Known globally for vision-care products and clinical solutions tied to eye health. The organization operates internationally and is commonly present in both hospital-linked and community eye-care channels. Depending on country, procurement may involve affiliated distributors and varying service arrangements. Whether a Stereoacuity test kit is in scope varies by manufacturer portfolio and region. Where the company’s products are already embedded in clinic pathways, purchasing teams may prioritize compatibility with existing training approaches and practice standards.
Alcon
A major player in ophthalmology with a broad footprint that often intersects hospital procurement in surgical and diagnostic ecosystems. Many facilities interact with Alcon through operating room ophthalmic equipment and consumables rather than basic vision-testing kits. Global reach is strong, but local service capabilities can vary by market maturity and distributor structure. Stereo testing products, if offered, are subject to regional catalog differences. Hospitals often value the predictability of supply chains that already handle high-volume ophthalmic consumables.
Topcon Healthcare
Commonly associated with ophthalmic diagnostic equipment used in clinics and hospitals, particularly for imaging and refraction-related platforms. Global presence is established, with distribution models that differ by country. Facilities may integrate Topcon systems into broader eye-care workflows where stereo testing is one component among many. Stereoacuity test kit availability varies by manufacturer and local product lines. In practice, Topcon’s presence often influences the ecosystem of training and service partners in a region.
Haag-Streit Group
Known in many regions for ophthalmic examination equipment used across clinic and hospital settings. The company’s products often appear in slit-lamp and diagnostic workflows where standardized visual function testing is relevant. International reach is supported through regional distribution and service partners. Stereo testing solutions and accessories, where offered, vary by manufacturer and local availability. In procurement terms, long product lifecycles and durable build quality are often key expectations associated with this segment of the market.

Vendors, Suppliers, and Distributors

For hospital procurement, the “who sells it” question is often as important as “who makes it,” particularly for small but high-turnover items like glasses/filters and test booklets.

Role differences between vendor, supplier, and distributor

A vendor is the seller you transact with (may be a manufacturer, distributor, or reseller).
A supplier is any entity providing goods or services into your supply chain (may include OEMs and wholesalers).
A distributor buys and stocks products (or drop-ships) and provides logistics, invoicing, and sometimes after-sales support.

In many countries, a single organization can act as vendor, supplier, and distributor depending on the contract structure.

From an operations viewpoint, the distributor’s role often determines:

Lead time consistency (critical for replacement filters in high-volume clinics)
Whether batch/lot information is supplied with orders (useful for internal traceability)
Whether training or in-service support is offered (common in some markets, limited in others)
How returns are handled when plates arrive damaged or when filters are incorrect

Top 5 World Best Vendors / Suppliers / Distributors

The list below is example global distributors (not a ranking). Availability of Stereoacuity test kit products varies by country, catalog, and regulatory market authorization.

Henry Schein
Often used by clinics and outpatient facilities for a wide range of medical and practice supplies. In many regions, it supports procurement with consolidated ordering, logistics, and account management services. Offerings and delivery capabilities vary by country and business unit. Buyer profiles frequently include outpatient eye-care and multi-site clinics. For small kits, the ability to bundle orders (gloves, disinfectants, lenses, and test kits) can reduce administrative time.
McKesson
A major healthcare supply and distribution organization in markets where it operates, supporting hospitals and large health systems with broad catalogs. Distribution strength often lies in standardized logistics and contracting mechanisms. Coverage and product availability vary significantly outside core operating regions. Stereoacuity test kit access may be through specialty catalog segments where available. For health systems, contract pricing and inventory management tools can be as influential as the list price of the kit.
Medline Industries
Known for hospital equipment and consumables distribution, often aligned with infection-control and standardization initiatives. Many facilities leverage Medline for consistent supply, product conversion support, and logistics services. International reach exists but varies by region and local structures. Vision-testing kits may be available through specific channels depending on the country. In practice, infection-control alignment (compatible wipes, clean/dirty workflow supplies) often pairs well with managing shared-accessory kits.
Cardinal Health
Commonly involved in large-scale hospital supply chains where it operates, offering distribution, inventory solutions, and procurement support. Service models can include consolidated purchasing and supply analytics, depending on contract. Geographic availability varies, and specialty eye-care items may be catalog-dependent. Local distributor partnerships may affect lead times for niche kits. For some buyers, the main value is predictable delivery and standardized invoicing across many departments.
Avantor (VWR)
Often used for laboratory and clinical supplies across hospitals, research, and academic medical centers. Strength frequently includes breadth of catalog and institutional purchasing integration. Availability of eye-care specific kits varies by market and local catalog configurations. Buyer profiles often include hospitals seeking consolidated procurement across departments. Where research and teaching programs are active, purchasing may include multiple kits for training environments, which increases the importance of durability and replacement parts.

Global Market Snapshot by Country

Below is a high-level operational view of demand and access for Stereoacuity test kit products and related services. The points are generalized and can differ widely by region, procurement model, and local regulation.

Across countries, a recurring theme is that stereoacuity kits are “small devices” but can still be procurement-sensitive: they depend on consumables (filters), consistent print/optical quality, and reliable distribution. In markets with fragmented distribution, facilities often build redundancy by holding spare glasses, keeping a backup kit, or selecting a test with simpler accessory needs.

India

Demand is supported by large pediatric populations, expanding eye-care chains, and school screening initiatives in many states. Many facilities rely on imported kits, while distribution depth is stronger in metro areas than in rural districts. Service support is typically through local distributors rather than direct manufacturer teams. Procurement often prioritizes durability, price stability, and availability of replacement glasses/filters.

In practice, multi-site eye-care networks may standardize on one near test for high-volume pediatric screening and keep a second kit type reserved for specialist clinics. Transport conditions (heat, dust, and humidity) can affect booklet longevity, so protective storage and careful handling are often emphasized.

China

Growth in eye-care services and strong attention to vision screening contribute to ongoing demand, especially in urban centers. Distribution networks are extensive, but product choice can be shaped by local registration, tendering rules, and hospital procurement policies. Some segments may have domestic alternatives, while specialized kits may still be imported. Access and training resources are generally stronger in tier-1 and tier-2 cities than in remote areas.

Operationally, large hospitals may purchase through centralized tender mechanisms, which can lead to longer product change cycles. Facilities sometimes prioritize kits with clear IFUs and consistent batch quality to reduce variability across high-throughput screening programs.

United States

Stereoacuity testing is common in outpatient eye-care and pediatric workflows, with stable demand across private practice and hospital-affiliated clinics. Procurement may favor standardized kits for network consistency, with attention to infection-control workflows and replacement part availability. Distribution is mature, and many buyers expect rapid fulfillment and clear product identifiers. Digital alternatives may appear in tech-forward practices, though adoption varies.

In many systems, purchasing decisions are influenced by whether replacement parts can be ordered easily under existing supply contracts. Some clinics also emphasize documentation fields that satisfy audit expectations (test name, distance, and correction) because occupational and school forms can require clear, repeatable records.

Indonesia

Demand is concentrated in urban hospitals and private clinics, with outreach and school screening programs influencing periodic purchasing. Many kits are imported, and availability can depend on distributor coverage across the archipelago. Service and training support may be uneven outside major cities. Procurement teams often balance upfront cost with ongoing consumables availability and lead times.

Because of geography and climate, storage durability and humidity resistance can become practical selection criteria. Clinics that run outreach programs may prefer kits that are lightweight, quick to set up, and easy to clean between patients in non-clinic environments.

Pakistan

Stereoacuity testing is used in eye clinics and tertiary centers, with demand shaped by urban service density and resource constraints. Import dependence is common, and procurement may be sensitive to currency fluctuations and distributor continuity. Replacement parts and consistent availability can be a challenge outside major cities. Training is often site-driven, emphasizing practical operator consistency.

Hospitals may keep buffer stock of filters or maintain more than one kit to avoid disruptions when supply chains are delayed. Clear internal SOPs can help maintain comparability when staffing changes or when different operators cover clinics.

Nigeria

Demand is driven by urban eye-care centers, private hospitals, and periodic screening programs, while rural access remains constrained by supply and workforce distribution. Import dependence is typical, and distributor networks vary widely by region. Facilities may prioritize ruggedness, ease of cleaning, and simple documentation. Service support for low-complexity kits is usually local and operational rather than manufacturer-led.

Where outreach programs operate, teams often adapt workflows to limited space and variable lighting. This increases the importance of distance control tools (measuring cords, marked lines) and durable cases that protect booklets during transport.

Brazil

A mixed public–private healthcare landscape supports demand across clinics, hospitals, and occupational health. Import channels exist, and some regions have stronger access to equipment distributors and training resources than others. Large cities tend to have better product choice and faster service. Procurement may emphasize regulatory compliance documentation and consistent supply for multi-site networks.

Institutions with multiple units may push for standardized kits across sites to reduce documentation variability. In some regions, public procurement cycles can encourage long planning horizons, making spare-part assurance (filters, replacement booklets) a key requirement during tendering.

Bangladesh

High patient volumes and expanding private eye-care services support demand, particularly in urban hubs. Many facilities rely on imported kits and local distributors, and lead times can influence purchasing decisions. Training is often in-house, with emphasis on quick, repeatable workflows. Rural access may be limited by distribution reach and staffing.

Some facilities prioritize kits that are intuitive for patients with varying literacy levels, using simple pointing responses and child-friendly targets to improve throughput while maintaining reliability.

Russia

Demand exists across ophthalmology clinics and hospitals, with procurement shaped by regulatory pathways, tender structures, and import dynamics. Availability of specific brands can fluctuate, leading some facilities to keep multiple equivalent kits or maintain buffer stock. Urban centers generally have stronger distributor coverage and service options. Standardization across regions can be challenging due to supply variability.

In operational terms, facilities may prefer kits with robust printed media and readily available replacement glasses because procurement delays can make small accessory failures disproportionately disruptive.

Mexico

Stereoacuity test kit demand is supported by a mix of public procurement and private clinic purchasing, particularly in cities. Distribution networks are relatively developed, but product selection and pricing can vary by region and contract channel. Facilities often seek kits with clear instructions and easily replaceable accessories. Rural access may depend on outreach programs and mobile clinics.

Some organizations incorporate stereo testing into occupational health screenings, which increases the importance of standardized documentation templates and consistent operator training across multiple sites.

Ethiopia

Demand is concentrated in referral hospitals, teaching centers, and NGO-supported eye-care programs, with limited access in many rural settings. Import dependence is common, and procurement is often project-based with strong price sensitivity. Distribution and after-sales support can be constrained, so facilities may favor robust, low-maintenance kits. Training frequently relies on standardized internal SOPs.

Where staffing is limited, programs often prioritize tests that are quick to explain and resistant to monocular cues, so that results remain credible even when screening volumes are high.

Japan

A mature healthcare system and strong clinical standardization support stable demand for vision testing tools. Procurement often emphasizes quality, documentation, and consistent performance across sites. Distribution and service ecosystems are well established, though product selection can be influenced by local market authorization and catalog practices. Facilities may integrate stereo testing into comprehensive ophthalmic assessment workflows.

Operationally, clinics may focus on reproducibility and documentation rigor, including standardized room setups and consistent test distances, to support meaningful longitudinal comparison.

Philippines

Demand is centered in urban hospitals and private clinics, with additional purchasing linked to community screening activities. Many kits are imported, and supply continuity can vary with distributor reach across islands. Training and operational consistency are key for multi-site organizations. Procurement teams often consider storage durability due to transport and humidity concerns.

Facilities that serve multiple islands or run mobile missions often place extra emphasis on rugged cases, clear scoring, and quick-clean accessories to keep screening lines moving safely.

Egypt

Demand is supported by dense urban healthcare networks and growing private sector eye-care services. Import dependence is common, and distributor relationships often determine brand availability and support. Hospitals may prioritize kits that are quick to administer and easy to clean in high-throughput environments. Rural access and standardization may be limited by staffing and supply logistics.

Some high-volume clinics prioritize spare filter availability and may standardize on a kit with commonly stocked replacement glasses to prevent interruptions during busy lists.

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Access is often concentrated in major urban centers and mission/NGO-supported facilities, with significant constraints in rural distribution. Import logistics, lead times, and funding cycles strongly shape purchasing decisions. Facilities typically prioritize basic, durable kits with minimal accessories and clear instructions. Training and quality control are usually handled locally due to limited manufacturer presence.

Because replacement parts can be difficult to obtain, durable filters and protective storage become especially important. Many programs also rely on internal checklists to maintain consistency across rotating staff and volunteers.

Vietnam

Expanding urban healthcare services and increasing attention to vision screening support demand, especially in major cities. Many facilities rely on imports, with distribution and after-sales support improving in established private hospital networks. Procurement may focus on consistent availability of replacement glasses/filters and standardized documentation. Rural access remains uneven, often supported by outreach programs.

In multi-site networks, buyers often prioritize kit standardization so that outcomes can be compared across hospitals and outreach units without cross-test confusion.

Iran

Demand exists across major hospitals and clinics, with procurement shaped by import pathways and local availability. Distributor continuity and supply stability can be significant considerations for replacement parts and consumables. Facilities often standardize around what can be reliably sourced and supported locally. Training tends to be internal, emphasizing repeatability and correct distance control.

In practice, departments may stock additional filters and keep clear internal guidance on acceptable cleaning agents to prolong kit life where resupply timing is uncertain.

Turkey

A strong healthcare service base in urban areas supports demand for routine vision testing tools, including stereo assessment. Import and local distribution channels are active, and private hospital groups often standardize kits across networks. Procurement decisions may weigh brand availability, warranty terms, and speed of supply. Rural access can vary, but referral networks help concentrate testing in equipped centers.

Hospital groups frequently aim for the same kit model across sites to reduce variability in documentation and staff training, especially when clinicians rotate between locations.

Germany

A mature medical device market and structured clinical workflows support steady demand, with procurement often emphasizing documented quality systems and consistent supply. Distribution and service infrastructure are strong, particularly for hospital networks and specialized eye-care centers. Facilities may maintain standardized kits across departments to support comparability. Replacement accessories are typically accessible, though product choice depends on catalog and contracting.

Operationally, some buyers also consider sustainability and lifecycle management—how often booklets are replaced, whether spare parts are available separately, and how cleaning protocols affect long-term optical performance.

Thailand

Demand is driven by urban hospitals, private clinics, and periodic screening initiatives, with distribution stronger in major provinces. Many kits are imported and sourced through established distributors that also provide training support. Procurement teams often consider ease of cleaning, durability in humid environments, and accessory replacement availability. Rural access is variable and often supported through outreach services.

For outreach use, Thai programs may prioritize kits that are quick to deploy in temporary setups, with durable plates that withstand transport and repeated cleaning in warm, humid conditions.

Key Takeaways and Practical Checklist for Stereoacuity test kit

Treat the Stereoacuity test kit as a standardized measurement tool, not a casual screening toy.
Always follow the manufacturer’s instructions for use and your facility’s SOPs.
Standardize on one kit model across sites when comparability matters.
Measure and document the exact viewing distance every time.
Control glare and reflections; glossy plates can invalidate results.
Verify the correct glasses/filters are used for the specific kit type.
Replace scratched, cloudy, or delaminated filters promptly to avoid false failures.
Inspect plates/booklets routinely for fading, bending, peeling, or stains.
Document the test name/model, not just the numeric result.
Record environmental deviations (lighting, distance constraints, interruptions) in the patient record.
Use consistent patient instructions to reduce coaching bias and variability.
Use demonstration items when available to confirm patient understanding early.
Watch for guessing behaviors and document “inconclusive” when reliability is poor.
Keep the patient seated and stable; avoid fall risk during any occlusion steps.
Stop the test if the patient reports dizziness, nausea, or significant discomfort.
Clean high-touch components between patients per infection-control policy.
Avoid soaking printed media unless explicitly permitted by the manufacturer.
Ensure disinfectant contact time is met before drying and storage.
Store the kit in a protective case to prevent warping and surface abrasion.
Maintain a simple asset log for multi-room or multi-site deployment.
Stock spare glasses/filters to prevent clinic downtime from minor damage.
Use procurement contracts that clarify warranty, returns, and spare-part availability.
Confirm whether replacement booklets/plates are orderable as standalone items.
Align cleaning products with material compatibility; “stronger” chemicals are not always better.
Train operators on monocular cues and other limitations that can distort results.
Avoid comparing results across different stereo tests as if they are equivalent.
Build an EMR template that forces entry of distance, kit type, and cooperation notes.
Escalate recurring reliability complaints to biomedical/clinical engineering for review.
For digital systems, control display settings and software versions to avoid drift.
Use quality checks (visual inspection, functional verification) at defined intervals.
Plan for rural or outreach use with rugged storage and humidity-aware handling.
In high-throughput clinics, define a clean/dirty workflow zone for shared accessories.
Include the Stereoacuity test kit in onboarding competency for relevant staff roles.
Review local regulatory and procurement requirements; classification varies by jurisdiction.
Do not force a numeric score when testing conditions are not met; document transparently.
Ensure patient communication accommodates language needs and hearing/vision limitations.
Re-test selectively rather than repeating the entire sequence when a single variable is wrong.
Consider whether anaglyph (red/green) tests are appropriate for patients with color-contrast limitations or heavy lens tints; document any factors that could affect color separation.
Where policy permits, run a quick periodic “known-good” functional check to confirm the kit still shows the intended depth effect under your clinic lighting.
Keep spare documentation sheets or a downtime workflow if the EMR template is unavailable; missing distance/test-type fields can make results unusable for comparison later.

If you are looking for contributions and suggestion for this content please drop an email to contact@surgeryplanet.com